Independent research and analyst ratings for cybersecurity consulting firms.

We evaluate cybersecurity consulting firms across five service domains and assign a CSCF Analyst Rating™ — a 0–100 composite score based on technical capability, specialization depth, client scale fit, value transparency, and market presence. The goal is to give buyers a clear, comparable basis for selection.

12
3
5
100

Ratings updated Feb 2026

All Rated Firms

All profiles →

Coalfire

Compliance & Risk Management

88
/ 100
Leader

Cybersecurity advisory and assessment services for compliance and risk management

$100k+ 250+ employees
View profile →

NetSPI

Penetration Testing

86
/ 100
Leader

Penetration testing and attack surface management at enterprise scale

$50k-$100k 250+ employees
View profile →

GuidePoint Security

vCISO / MDR

85
/ 100
Leader

Cybersecurity solutions focusing on detection, response, and security transformation

$100k+ 250+ employees
View profile →

Schellman

Compliance Auditing

84
/ 100
Strong Performer

Independent compliance assessment and certification for SOC, ISO, HITRUST, and more

$50k-$100k 250+ employees
View profile →

TrustedSec

Penetration Testing

82
/ 100
Strong Performer

Offensive security and penetration testing specialists

$25k-$50k 50-100 employees
View profile →

Tevora

Compliance / vCISO

78
/ 100
Strong Performer

Cybersecurity consulting specializing in compliance, risk management, and vCISO services

$50k-$100k 100-250 employees
View profile →
View all 12 rated firms →

What is CSCF Research?

CSCF Research is an independent analyst publication covering the cybersecurity consulting services market. We evaluate firms across five service domains — compliance, penetration testing, vCISO services, industry specialization, and incident response — and publish structured ratings based on a defined methodology.

Our CSCF Analyst Rating™ is a 0–100 composite score built from five equally weighted dimensions: technical capability, specialization depth, client scale fit, value and transparency, and market presence. Phase 1 ratings are based on publicly available information. Phase 2 will incorporate vendor interviews and client references.

We don't accept payment to inflate ratings. Firms with featured listings are identified as such; their ratings are determined independently by the same criteria applied to all firms.

Rating Dimensions

Technical Capability 0–20 pts
Specialization Depth 0–20 pts
Client Scale Fit 0–20 pts
Value & Transparency 0–20 pts
Market Presence 0–20 pts
Composite Score 0–100

Rating Tiers

Leader 85–100

Exceptional across most dimensions. Clear market authority in their primary service area.

Strong Performer 70–84

Strong in core area. Reliable choice with competitive value and track record.

Contender 55–69

Competent but with gaps or narrow focus. Suitable for specific buyer needs.

Challenger 40–54

New or limited track record. Potential upside, but less data to evaluate.